Upper limb assessment in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of outcome measures and their psychometric properties.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of applied upper limb outcome measures in multiple sclerosis (MS) according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) levels and to review their psychometric properties in MS. DATA SOURCES PubMed and Web of Knowledge. STUDY SELECTION Articles published until June 2013 were selected when written in English, published in the last 25 years, peer reviewed, including >5 persons with MS, and including standardized clinical upper limb outcome measures. Included articles were screened based on title/abstract and full text by 2 independent reviewers. In case of doubt, feedback from a third independent reviewer was obtained. Additionally, references lists were checked for relevant articles. Of the articles, 109 met the selection criteria and were included for data extraction. DATA EXTRACTION All reported clinical upper limb outcome measures were extracted from the included studies and classified according to the ICF levels by 2 independent reviewers. In addition, available psychometric properties (reliability, validity, responsiveness) in MS were summarized and discussed. DATA SYNTHESIS A diversity of outcome measures assessing impairments on the body functions and structures level (n=33), upper limb capacity (n=11), and performance (n=8) on the activity level were extracted from 109 articles. Hand grip strength and the nine-hole peg test (NHPT) were the most frequently used outcome measures. However, multiple outcome measures are necessary to encapsulate the multidimensional character of the upper limb function. The psychometric properties were insufficiently documented for most of the outcome measures, except for the NHPT. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review may help with the selection of appropriate outcome measures and may guide future research regarding the psychometric properties in MS.
منابع مشابه
A systematic review protocol to evaluate the psychometric properties of measures of function within adult neuro-rehabilitation
BACKGROUND Spasticity in the upper limb is common after acquired brain impairment and may have a significant impact on the ability to perform meaningful daily activities. Traditionally, outcome measurement in spasticity rehabilitation has focused on impairment, however, improvements in impairments do not necessarily translate to improvements in an individual's ability to perform activities or e...
متن کاملParticipation Assessment Scales for 4 to 18 years old individuals with Cerebral Palsy: A systematic review
Objectives: Participation is defines as involvement within a life situation and the ultimate outcome for individuals with disabilities. One of the most common cause of chronic disability that restricts participation of individuals is Cerebral palsy (CP). The main goal of rehabilitation is empowering participation of their clients in different life areas. To achieve changes in participation, ass...
متن کاملEvaluation of functional outcome measures for the hemiparetic upper limb: a systematic review.
OBJECTIVE To identify valid and reliable outcome measures reflective of "real-life" active and passive function for application following focal rehabilitation interventions in the hemiparetic upper limb after stroke or brain injury. METHODS A systematic review of the literature, incorporating a wide-based search including electronic databases, primary reports, abstracts and conference proceed...
متن کاملThe Comparative Content Review of the Persian Participation Assessment Measures: A Systematic Review
Objectives: Facilitating participation is regarded as the primary goal and outcome of rehabilitation. According to the importance of comprehensive assessment of participation in occupational areas (social participation, work, education, instrumental activities of daily living, activities of daily living, rest and sleep, leisure, and play), all available studies on the development or translation...
متن کاملAn overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke
BACKGROUND Although use of standardized and scientifically sound outcome measures is highly encouraged in clinical practice and research, there is still no clear recommendation on which tools should be preferred for upper extremity assessment after stroke. As the aims, objectives and methodology of the existing reviews of the upper extremity outcome measures can vary, there is a need to bring t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
دوره 95 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014